Let's strip the definition of Feminism down to its bare bones: feminism stands for the political, social, and economic equality of men and women. It's a simple definition, right? So why is there all the uproar, all the negative connotations, all the opposition? As with any religion, feminism seems to have acquired a bad reputation through radical feminists, misinterpretation of what feminism actually stands for, and overall negativity. This is the first of many of my attempts to tackle the misconceptions society seems to have about the feminist movement.
First and foremost, feminists do not hate men, nor are we trying to "bring men down." What we're trying to do is get rid of the gap that seems to exist between a male's place in society and a woman's. The aim of feminism is to stop telling women that their "place is in the home," but at the same time, that it's not shameful if they do decide to stay at home. Feminism strives to provide a choice to women. The stay- at- home mom deserves just as much respect and accolades as the mother who chooses to pursue a career as well. Feminism also tries to point out that women are just as capable of assuming executive positions and other positions of power in the corporate and STEM world. Not that men are undeserving- rather, that women are just as deserving of these positions. There are women out there who hate men, which is known as misandry. Please do not get this mixed up with feminism. Hating the opposite sex is not something that is in the feminist agenda. That being said, calling men out on the harassment that seems to have become the norm in this society is not misandry. It's high time society knows that's not okay.
I've often heard the argument of "if feminism really stands for the equality of the sexes, why not call yourself an egalitarian instead of a feminist?" Or, "Why doesn't feminism help men, too? Men are objectified and oppressed in America as well." Yes, men are often displayed as sexual objects in advertisements and other media outlets as well. And yes, that's wrong too. The difference here lies in the depth of the objectification. Let's take the ever popular Clavin Klein underwear ads. A man with artfully mussed/gelled hair and sculpted arms, pecs, and abs is essentially naked except for the underwear (obviously). Does it hold men to an unrealistic standard? Of course, male models are airbrushed to the same extent that female models are. Of course women walk past it and think to themselves something along the lines of, "wow, that model's hot." However, no one says that any man who poses for an ad like that "lacks self respect." On the contrary, many young girls are told that lingerie models have no respect for themselves. Furthermore, in most cases, men have the luxury of society still taking them seriously no matter how ridiculous these ads are. The fact that men are more respected in society is not right. Women, on the other hand, are often hyper-sexualized in advertising as an angle to sell products. Plenty of advertising also only encourages violence against and stereotyping of women, but that's for another blog post. There's one other crucial fact that should be taken into account: in most cases, the hyper sexualization of men in advertising happens when the company is selling items pertaining to men (like underwear). However, the advertising world is full of terribly sexist and objectifying ads towards women in more instances than just lingerie.
Feminism does strive to end gender stereotypes and traditional roles- for both men and women. This means that telling boys to "man up," "grow a pair," or "stop crying, don't be a pussy" needs to go. Staunching the ability of boys to find an outlet for frustration, anger, stress, etc needs to go. There is nothing shameful about a boy who write poetry or a boy who cries. That being said, the stereotype that only boys are good at math and science, or that only boys can become doctors and engineers needs to go. "Hey, you run like a girl" shouldn't be an insult, because I can tell you that some of the fastest runners I know are girls. So, yes, feminism does try to "help men too." The problem is that society has stamped on women so much that a women-centered movement to force society to pay attention to these flaws is necessary - which says something in itself.
The last counter-argument I'm going to tackle is one that tends to make me the angriest: feminism promotes the victim mindset. Au contraire- feminism seeks to empower women, and victims of rape, abuse, etc. We live in a society permeated by victim-blaming and slut-shaming (though this, also, is a topic for another blog post). The horrifically ineffective and often traumatizing ways colleges handle rape cases is proof enough of that fact. Even in the media, when a rapist is found guilty and given a prison sentence, the media mourns the loss of the boy's football career, or job, or comments on what the girl was wearing, how drunk she was, whether or not she was walking alone at night. The media humanizes the rapist rather than trying to lift up the victim. We, as women, need to band together and say "enough is enough" when it comes to rape, especially in terms of college rapes and how colleges handle it. Feminism strives to provide a sisterhood of empowerment, though not one of estrangement to men.
I hope this makes you think twice before you mistake feminism for misandry, make any negative comments about it, or believe a misinterpretation of the feminist agenda. If someone is using feminism as a vessel for misandry or any other negative purpose, then they're not really feminists. I'm sure I'll be met with a lot of dissent, but know there will be plenty of other blog posts in the future elaborating on many of the points I've made here.
~Simran
First and foremost, feminists do not hate men, nor are we trying to "bring men down." What we're trying to do is get rid of the gap that seems to exist between a male's place in society and a woman's. The aim of feminism is to stop telling women that their "place is in the home," but at the same time, that it's not shameful if they do decide to stay at home. Feminism strives to provide a choice to women. The stay- at- home mom deserves just as much respect and accolades as the mother who chooses to pursue a career as well. Feminism also tries to point out that women are just as capable of assuming executive positions and other positions of power in the corporate and STEM world. Not that men are undeserving- rather, that women are just as deserving of these positions. There are women out there who hate men, which is known as misandry. Please do not get this mixed up with feminism. Hating the opposite sex is not something that is in the feminist agenda. That being said, calling men out on the harassment that seems to have become the norm in this society is not misandry. It's high time society knows that's not okay.
A Calvin Klein Underwear Ad (taken from Google Images) |
Feminism does strive to end gender stereotypes and traditional roles- for both men and women. This means that telling boys to "man up," "grow a pair," or "stop crying, don't be a pussy" needs to go. Staunching the ability of boys to find an outlet for frustration, anger, stress, etc needs to go. There is nothing shameful about a boy who write poetry or a boy who cries. That being said, the stereotype that only boys are good at math and science, or that only boys can become doctors and engineers needs to go. "Hey, you run like a girl" shouldn't be an insult, because I can tell you that some of the fastest runners I know are girls. So, yes, feminism does try to "help men too." The problem is that society has stamped on women so much that a women-centered movement to force society to pay attention to these flaws is necessary - which says something in itself.
The last counter-argument I'm going to tackle is one that tends to make me the angriest: feminism promotes the victim mindset. Au contraire- feminism seeks to empower women, and victims of rape, abuse, etc. We live in a society permeated by victim-blaming and slut-shaming (though this, also, is a topic for another blog post). The horrifically ineffective and often traumatizing ways colleges handle rape cases is proof enough of that fact. Even in the media, when a rapist is found guilty and given a prison sentence, the media mourns the loss of the boy's football career, or job, or comments on what the girl was wearing, how drunk she was, whether or not she was walking alone at night. The media humanizes the rapist rather than trying to lift up the victim. We, as women, need to band together and say "enough is enough" when it comes to rape, especially in terms of college rapes and how colleges handle it. Feminism strives to provide a sisterhood of empowerment, though not one of estrangement to men.
I hope this makes you think twice before you mistake feminism for misandry, make any negative comments about it, or believe a misinterpretation of the feminist agenda. If someone is using feminism as a vessel for misandry or any other negative purpose, then they're not really feminists. I'm sure I'll be met with a lot of dissent, but know there will be plenty of other blog posts in the future elaborating on many of the points I've made here.
~Simran